A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is one of the aspect that determines whether a nation is fully developed or not. Academic institutions have the responsibility to teach and nurture the younger generation that will lead the nation in the future. There are several ways that a nation can do to improve the quality of its education system. One of the ways is to ensure that all citizens are being taught the basic of some important subjects. To do that, every school in a nation should apply the same curriculum to ensure all students are learning the important subjects.
The first reason why students should study the same material is to create an even field when they entering college. If there are two economic students that do not have the same mathematical background, it will be very disadvantageous for the student who has lower mathematical knowledge. Student with the less mathematic background might need to spend additional semester to make up for his/her lacking knowledge. This surely will delay the creation of a nation’s skilled workers, which will have negative impact to the economy.
Another reason why student should study under the same curriculum is to help them to discover their interest. You will not know that you like to sing until you try it. By exposing students to various subjects, students will know better the subject that they are passionate about. On the other hand, student will also recognize which subject that they dislike. In conclusion, not only student will discover their passion, they will also avoid the pitfall of choosing the career that are not interesting to them.
Some people might argue that student should only learn the material that s/he interested into. This statement is true only for college student. However, elementary or high school students still need to learn the basic of every subjects that might not be their interest. For instance, high school students that love to cook still need to know some simple arithmetic calculation because a chef will have to calculate the ratio of the ingredients when s/he has to make a big batch of cookie dough.
To sum up, a nation should educate its young generation with the same curriculum. However, it is advisable to teach students with only the basic of every subject. A school should let the student to choose whether s/he wants to study the subjects in more depth. The point of this is to avoid unnecessary stress that could be created among the student. For example, someone with interest in English literature will find learning advance history as something that is tedious and stressful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 428, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to advance'
Suggestion: to advance
...n English literature will find learning advance history as something that is tedious an...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212765957447 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.18085106383 0.157235817809 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0808510638298 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0468085106383 0.0497285424764 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.036170212766 0.0444667217837 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0936170212766 0.12292977631 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0212765957447 0.0406280797675 52% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58794630912 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0510638297872 0.030933414821 165% => OK
Particles: 0.00425531914894 0.0016655270985 255% => OK
Determiners: 0.114893617021 0.0997080785238 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0468085106383 0.0249443105267 188% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.031914893617 0.0148568991511 215% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2586.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 431.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345707656613 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266821345708 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.190255220418 0.200843997647 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104408352668 0.132149295362 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58794630912 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480278422274 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 53.1501803581 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7391304348 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.952941003 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.434782609 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7391304348 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 45.4212650055 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.24193548387 1.64882698954 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378539386137 0.391690518653 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11732558386 0.123202303941 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.086163702327 0.077325440228 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.538127098702 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11287932911 0.149214159877 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150290853784 0.161403998019 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844709480752 0.0892212321368 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.419277173664 0.385218514788 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0262264054618 0.0692045440612 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261223843809 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427004159098 0.0653680567796 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.