Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The topic poses a controversial issue of whether countries should preserve wilderness area through the passage of laws that would prevent companies from developing on these lands. Presumably, development of such areas would allow economic growth and expansion, bringing jobs and housing to overcrowded cities. Nonetheless, the wild is rapidly shrinking along with the many species of animals whose survival depend on these undeveloped lands. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that remaining wilderness areas should be developed for profit and am inclined to argue that nature and its resources should be protected for years to come
.
First of all, humans depend on the oxygen that plants and trees produce in order to survive. I would like to point out that the majority of these oxygen producing sources thrive in areas untouched by humans. In addition to producing oxygen, plants and trees use carbon dioxide for their own internal processes, lowering the carbon dioxide from our atmosphere. To elucidate, let us look at an example of how a plant undergoes photosynthesis. For photosynthesis to occur, a plant needs energy from the sun,carbon dioxide, and water. Carbon dioxide is emitted heavily by humans which can then cleaned up from the earth’s atmosphere. Therefore, it is quite evident that we need to have large areas of trees and plants to help clean our toxic air.
Furthermore, developing on lands where animals call their home is quickly reducing the diversity of animals left on our planet. An occurring instance that comes to mind is the destruction of the orangutan’s habitat in Indonesia. Millions of acres of wilderness is being burned down for economic gain by the palm oil companies. Orangutans are starving to death because they are running out of available land to live on. Both common sense and history tells us that, if nothing is done by the nation’s government, the orangutan will be another species to add to the list of animals driven to extinction.
Certainly, the human population is continuously growing and will need more land and space to survive on. This is especially true in China where at one point the population was growing at such a fast pace that the government had to restrict how many children a family could have. However, the above argument does not constitute sufficient support to the claim that using the undeveloped lands will solve overpopulation.
In conclusion, though developing land may be useful in creating new space for people to live and lead to economic growth in that area, it doesn’t solve the long-term issue of overpopulation or the destruction of mother nature. As long as population numbers are monitored and resources are reinvested into the already existing economy, then preserving the undeveloped environment should be a top priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female educa 69
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 82
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 42
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 643, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s should be protected for years to come . First of all, humans depend on the ox...
^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this oxygen' or 'these oxygens'?
Suggestion: this oxygen; these oxygens
... like to point out that the majority of these oxygen producing sources thrive in areas untou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , carbon
...occur, a plant needs energy from the sun,carbon dioxide, and water. Carbon dioxide is e...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the above argument does not constitute sufficient support to the claim that usi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22925764192 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93158931296 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57423580786 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4320742909 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.047619048 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225647941704 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581009858081 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672866375343 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116196269909 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864289165837 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.