Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
For centuries, human activities have had tremendous impact on natural wilderness of the earth. The size of wilderness have declined rapidly over the years. It is, thus, understandable that environmentalists would want legislature to pass over laws that preserve remaining wilderness. Though the viewpoint is fair it does not work in poverty ridden states where people are suffering over basic human needs such as food and shelter.
The purpose of the above statement is to bridge the discussion of national heritage and well being of the citizens. Success of this kind of policy is dubious because the public would never support something which limit their chances of making a decent livelihood. Instead, the land of wilderness might be used for setting up industries and providing employment and other economic activities. It could also attract further development of supporting businesses on nearby lands. It would make little sense for the government to pass laws that curb employment opportunities for the citizens, especially in developing nations. If the government is democratic, it would further abate their enthusiasm to pass a policy which the public is against.
To further emphasise my point, consider the example to Boston, a well known state in India which was covered in wilderness for majority of last century. The housing prices were towering so much so that not a single family in general population could have afforded to pay rent. Famine and depression struck for quite a few months and mortality rate suffered greatly. Only after the preservation policy got stricken down, did the lifestyle of people improved. Again, it further proves that such a policy will not always work as intended and care should be taken to examine the context, the local culture and the economic situation.
However, even for nations that do not suffer with the problems of housing or food shortage, it makes more sense to consider a conservation policy than a preservation policy. The key difference being that the former allows development in a more sustainable manner. For example, under conservation program, wilderness could be integrated with tourism industry where small houses and hotels could be setup to facilitate the program. Efforts should be made to minimise the damage while getting maximum benefits through the resources. This policy would also get more support from the public and in turn benefit the government.
Consequently, it is evident that for developing nations, where the available land and food are not up to the demand, it is more beneficial to utilise the land of the wilderness for sake of the livelihood of the citizens. Even for developed countries, a conservation policy would be a better approach than a preservation one for the reasons laid above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 81
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 93
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 83
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... chances of making a decent livelihood. The land of wilderness might be used for se...
^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... the context, the local culture and the economical situation. However, even for nations...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2361.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2583518931 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87242098714 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541202672606 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9256558533 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.318181818 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30298902083 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810861134905 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436533305473 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162840774701 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320317751773 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.