Well-being of the society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
The issue of whether or not people should question the authority is a contentious one. While each side has its strength and weaknesses, I believe that people should question the authority, because this make authorities answerable for their action, it enables transparency between common people and people in position of authority. Furthermore, questioning the authority makes sure that while implementing any law or policy people's choices and their best interests are taken into consideration.
For any society to function smoothly and efficiently there should be proper law and order in place along with rules and regulations., and there are authorities appointed for this job. These authorities are appointed by common people voting for the candidate. When any new laws or policies are implemented, it should be in best interest of the society and not for any personal agenda. To make sure that it is in society's interest those laws or policies should be evaluated and this evaluation should be carried out by the people of society. Carrying the evaluation gives room to the people to see whether or not they are satisfied with the authorities work and also allows them to question it if they have any concerns. This evaluation makes sure that, authorities cannot implement anything that they see fit according to them, because they will be answerable for their actions.
Questioning the actions of authority ensures transparency between common people and people in the position of authority. When society elects any candidate for the position, they have high expectations from the candidate in regards with the enhancement of society and wellbeing of the citizens. This is the reason as to why people have right to know, what the authorities are up to in the fulfillment of their duties, and also to put forward their concerns or dissatisfaction if they have any from the authorities. This public participation in a healthy way is essential for the functioning and enhancement of the society. Society and governing bodies are like the two side of each coin, both rely on one another both need to work with each other, and answering questions and grievances is the fundamental duty of the authority.
We live in an era where democracy and freedom of speech remains the fundamental principles of any nation. In society, we are concerned about the authority and their actions, and we want to ensure that there is not dictatorship. For this questioning the authority for their actions in proper way is not a bad thing at all. To conclude, it is essential and beneficial when people ask questions from time to time for society's well-being or when they feel that something is misleading or irrelevant and ask the authorities and have a clear understanding of it. It will also help in the betterment of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
- Educators should find out what students want to be included in the curriculum and then offer it to them Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 66
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 58
- Well being of the society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not people should question the authority is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
... policies are implemented, it should be in best interest of the society and not for any...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...luation gives room to the people to see whether or not they are satisfied with the authorities...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy way" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... authorities. This public participation in a healthy way is essential for the functioning and en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07112068966 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94198559539 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431034482759 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2345884258 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.842105263 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36842105263 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362619797148 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120613621503 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830312908931 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240902592878 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017546794693 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.