The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000
The bar graph compares the different rates in world illiteracy between men and women in various of regions in 2000. As can be seen from the chart, the female illiteracy rates was much higher than index of male in most regions.
In 2000, South Asia experienced the highest level of illiteracy in both gender.While the male rates stood at 33%, this figure of female was one and a half times the former. For the estimation in Arab States and Sub-Saharan African, the pattern is similar. The rates of female was much lower with just 29%. Female illiteracy estimation slightly declined to 48% in Sub-Saharan Africa compared to precisely 30% of male rates.
Developed countries saw the smallest rate of both gender with 2% of female and only 1% of male. The figure almost stood at the same level of around 10% in Latin America and Caribbean. However, in East Asia and Oceania witnessed a considerable difference between female and male (20% and 8%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | maraandronache | view | |
| 2023-04-10 | bnhanh02 | 10 | view |
| 2022-01-21 | kostina_m1986 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Vuthungan | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | mnaufaln | 84 | view |
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. 56
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 78
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 82
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...hest level of illiteracy in both gender.While the male rates stood at 33%, this figur...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[7]
Message: Possible agreement error. You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...pattern is similar. The rates of female was much lower with just 29%. Female illite...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84049079755 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56108334091 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.273386311 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24270609341 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953649101888 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727055445603 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165156644345 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086177810536 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.