The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The bar charts give information about the number of graduate and postgraduate students who had four choices of destination excluding full-time work in UK in 2008. Overall, it can be seen that most of both subjects chose further study and part-time job.
Regarding to graduate students, the highest number belonged to further study, which was approximately 30,000 students. Nearly twice lower than that was part-time work, 17,735 students and it was slightly higher than the quantity of unemployment students which was 16,235 students. Voluntary work experienced the lowest number because it was chosen by only 3,500 graduate students.
Postgraduate had the same trend as graduate that further study, part-time work, unemployment and voluntary work is respectively from the highest to the lowest. There saw 2,725 students joined further study whereas just over 2,500 students chose part-time job. Nearly 900 students less when compared with the above two options was 1,625 of unemployment. 345, which is the quantity of postgraduate choosing voluntary work, was the smallest number.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- Write about the following topic.Some people decide to start their own business instead of working for a company or organisation. Do the advantages for people working for their own business outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and includ 89
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar chart shows the percentage of people in the United Kingdom per age group without any qualifications
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53012048193 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76542113822 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4995446232 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205785976962 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952589684819 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852191805975 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16425583599 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684841776038 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.