The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The charts demonstrate information about the average of participation in education and the highest education level of adults between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, in the bar chart, adult males were the highest while adult females were the lowest every year. Parallel to that, in the pie chart the percentage of university qualification was the highest for both years while the rate of primary school qualification was the lowest in the two periods.
For the bar chart, adult males tended to have strong and significant increases for five consecutive years. From 2000 to 2002, they increased by 0.5% and continued to increase by 0.5% in 2004. The number of male learners increased by 2% in 2008 and rose by 1% at the end of this period. While for adult females, they had to level up for the next three years. However, from 2004 to 2008 there was a change and the number of female learners increased by approximately 1%, and in the final year the percentage of female learners was not significant only increased by 0.5%.
For the pie chart, in 2000 the rate of university qualification accounted for only 8.3% and continued to increase by 24.63% in 2010. Conversely, in 2010, the percentage of primary school graduates decreased by approximately 23.67% from 25.77% to 2.1%.
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What are the causes of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 61
- Many people use social media every day to keep in touch with friends and get social news Do you think the advantages of it outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- Some people argue that is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life 60
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91244239631 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79904511011 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47465437788 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8293280806 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278668985402 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122687106953 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16562577325 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232538862403 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.216690353819 0.0819641961636 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91244239631 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79904511011 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47465437788 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8293280806 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278668985402 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122687106953 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16562577325 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232538862403 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.216690353819 0.0819641961636 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.