The given map highlights the development of, a village near London, keeping a track of its expansion since 1986 and comparing its area and communication access over four distinct periods.
At first glance, it looks like the area of Chorleywood has increased tremendously over the given 126 years time and eight new colonies can be identified in 1994, spreading along the main roads, Motorway, and Railway station.
In 1868 Chorleywood was a small village just across the right of the vertical main road, but after fifteen years, it expanded parallel to the same main road, where a Railway station was built later in 1909. It was the only development for the next 39 years. Then two new localities were built parallel to the railway line but separated by the second development and the main road. For the next forty-eight years, Chorleywood consisted of these four discrete locales until the introduction of Motorway in 1970, when five new pockets emerged over the next 24 years. Two of these new communities were situated at the intersection of Motorway and the horizontal Main road; one on either side of the Motorway. The other three surfaced on the area where Motorway was crossing the Railway line.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heared everywhere nowadays?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant ex 84
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the 19th century. The map below shows the development of the village. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of the village. 73
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would be better if more good news was reported? 73
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99504950495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67589255036 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5617874549 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110503712689 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541928185959 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510737559672 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848140315475 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491404510956 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.