The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The given bar chart illustrates the number of telephones owned per thousand of the population in different countries over a five-year period from 2000 to 2004.
Overall, It can be seen that there are many different trends in landline telephone ownership. The trend in Singarpore was always the highest in this area from 2000 to 2004. By contrast, cambodia, indonesia, lao pdr and myanmar were in the group which is the lowest number of landline telephone ownership.
From 2000 to 2004, Vietnam, Thailand and Philippines witnessed a steadily increase in the number of landline telephones, with nearly 50,90 and 100 respectively.The trend in landline telephone ownership in Brunei Darussalam also experienced a slightly decrease at about 225 in 2004 While that figure in Singapore reached a peaked at over 450.
Besides, The lowest number of ownership group including cambodia, indonesia, lao pdr and myanmar saw a slowly decline in the period from 2000 to 2004. cambodia's landline telephone ownership grew steadily to exactly 50 in 2004. Especially, there was no one using landline telephone in indonesia and lao pdr in 2000. Luckily,in 2002 and 2004 there was a small upward in that figure in indonesia and lao pdr, with over 25 and 10 respectively.
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of having an older lovers 32
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 73
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart illustrates the number of telephones owned per thousand ...
^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... Overall, It can be seen that there are many different trends in landline telephone ownership....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...nam, Thailand and Philippines witnessed a steadily increase in the number of landline telephones, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... with nearly 50,90 and 100 respectively.The trend in landline telephone ownership i...
^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...p in Brunei Darussalam also experienced a slightly decrease at about 225 in 2004 While that figure ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slowly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...dia, indonesia, lao pdr and myanmar saw a slowly decline in the period from 2000 to 2004. cambod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cambodias
...ecline in the period from 2000 to 2004. cambodias landline telephone ownership grew stead...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...n indonesia and lao pdr in 2000. Luckily,in 2002 and 2004 there was a small upward...
^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ao pdr in 2000. Luckily,in 2002 and 2004 there was a small upward in that figure ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17156862745 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88709676986 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53431372549 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6384466296 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161005830312 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819202368807 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688861692831 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129175541151 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745144685109 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.