The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
These line graphs or polygrams illustrate the number of production and using energy in the USA between 1950 and 2000 and it estimates trends up to 2025 as a whole. It is clearly observed that the data represented by the graph reflect certain interesting fluctuations. In general, both percentages of using and consumption of energy have experience of upward trends. Alternatively, according to graphs ,it is interesting point that the percentage of using energy is higher than producing energy during these years.
Studying the graph in more details, in 1950 ,the percentage of consuming and producing energy is about 28% and 25% respectively. Then, From 1950 to 1975, the percentage of consuming and producing energy has increased dramatically by some fluctuations in first years. After that which means between 1975 to 2000, there is a significant increase in the percentage of using energy with lots of fluctuations by 35% while the percentage of production of energy has grown steady from 65% to 70% . Also ,it is observed that the percentage of using and producing energy will reach to 130% and 90% respectively. Moreover, we can observe that there is little difference between the consumption and using energy in 1950 by contrast there will be a significant difference between them in 2025.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-01 | NSMDeadshot0411 | view | |
| 2022-12-01 | NSMDeadshot0411 | view | |
| 2022-07-09 | quytnee | 82 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Gulinoza | 80 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 78 | view |
- People s shopping habits depend more on the age group that they belong to than any other factor 61
- People s shopping habits depend more on the age group that they belong to than any other factor 61
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 67
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education or shopping To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ends. Alternatively, according to graphs ,it is interesting point that the percent...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... producing energy during these years. Studying the graph in more details, in 1...
^^
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dying the graph in more details, in 1950 ,the percentage of consuming and producin...
^^
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f using energy with lots of fluctuations by 35% while the percentage of productio...
^^
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... energy has grown steady from 65% to 70% . Also ,it is observed that the percentag...
^^
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... has grown steady from 65% to 70% . Also ,it is observed that the percentage of us...
^^
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to 130% and 90% respectively. Moreover, we can observe that there is little diff...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14691943128 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01199098797 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4036392308 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204775514987 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096133447728 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378849651946 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174214270741 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00142782440497 0.0819641961636 2% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.