The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The line graph compares the amount of money expended on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria over a period of 10 years.
It is clearly that the amount of money on books in four countries had a rising tendency form 1995 to 2005.
In 1995, German paid out 80 million on books –the highest amount of money, compared to Austrian spent on 30 million dollar while French and Italian spent about 55 million dollar and 50 million dollar on books respectively.
During 1995 to 2005, the amount of money spent on books increased lightly around 95 million dollars, 75 million dollar and 60 million dollars respectively in Germany, France and Italy. However, the amount of money spent on books in Austria rose gradually from 30 million to 40 million dollar in 1999 and it stayed at same level until 2001 to start jumping rapidly at 72 million dolar in 2005.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 31
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are causes of global warming and measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issues? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 89
- price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, andcarbonated drinks The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables,sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information b 78
- These days it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in the city Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation migration from the country to the city and suggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed 53
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 715.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73509933775 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28830707793 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8501908393 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349062085328 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229001667576 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842417133419 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250211638285 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837956996466 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.