The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The amount of refferals recieved from January to June in 2011 , by the Tourist Information Office in one city , showcases by the given linear graph.
At a glance the graph reveals a surge in personal and telephone enquiries while the enquiries by letters have declined with the time. Eventhough the in person referrals encountered the lowest number and letter/email enquiries showed a higher number than in person referrals by January, there is a significant reversal pattern of above two types by June.
Simultaneously, in person refferals have been started at the lowest number between 400-600 while letter/email and telephone enquiries taken up relatively higher numbers of 600-800 and 800-1000 respectively. Even if the starting numbers were like that , By June , in person refferals were grown upto 1800-2000. On the other hand telephone enquiries also show acontinuous growth with slight fluctuations until June while letter/email enquiries have shown a steady pattern until March but declined between march to June which has shown a negative growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
- Some people think that work is the most important thing of people s life Without the success of career life becomes meaningless To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Tobacco mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day The long term health costs are high for the smokers themselves and for the wider community in terms of health 72
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- schools should prepare students for university rather than for work How far do you agree with this statement Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from your own experience or observations 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ls recieved from January to June in 2011 , by the Tourist Information Office in on...
^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e Tourist Information Office in one city , showcases by the given linear graph. ...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n if the starting numbers were like that , By June , in person refferals were grow...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tarting numbers were like that , By June , in person refferals were grown upto 180...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45731707317 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92551500399 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1245670527 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.166666667 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149848342979 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859932490788 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703440132274 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134299147939 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747479889212 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.