The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children's sports and participation in different sports in UK from 2008 to 2014.
The line graphs reveal the data about how much money allocated on children’s sports every month and the popularity of different kinds of sport among British children between 2008 and six years later.
An overview is that the average monthly expense on children’s sports witnessed an upward trend whereas football was the favorite leisure activity during the time given.
Beginning at 20 million pounds in 2008, the spending on children’s sport climbed to nearly 25 million after two years, which was subsequently subjected to a marked increase of 5 million, reaching 28 million. Interestingly, this figure kept surging and peaked at 32 million by the end of the survey.
In terms of three genres of sports, football was dominant in the list, with 8 million children participating, which was fourfold the statistics for swimming and eight times more than that of athletics in the beginning year. Despite a marginal fall in 2010, the number of children playing football gradually rose to reach the top of 9 million in 2014. The similar trend was seen in the figure for swimming, which ended at 4 million while after a stable period, there was a remarkable increase of 4 million in the number of children choosing athletic, which then remained unchanged at 5 million until 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe that children should do what their parents tell them to do; others think children must learn to think for themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The diagram below shows the process of collecting rain water for use in an Australian town. 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of population of Yemen and Italy in 2002 and projection for 2050. 78
- In the modern world, mobile and smartphone use has become universal in most parts of the world. Although there are clearly many advantages of this technology, there are many who believe it also brings many disadvantages. Discuss both points of view and gi 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08450704225 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83798059894 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615023474178 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1574480738 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.714285714 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181763509353 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913790617803 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885713576717 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137458958485 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891104770518 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.