The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015.
Given is the line graph delineating worldwide requesting different fabric fibers, during a period of 35 years, commencing from 1980 to 2005.
Perceptibly, the demand for polyester, coton and cellulosic ratched up over the course of time, meanwhile the reverse was true for wool. Moreover, the amount of polyester was higher in size than coton in the final year.
There were a few products using polyester before reporting an escalation to 9 million in 1992 and thereafter this rate overlapped coton and achieved its zenith of nearly 70 million in the end of the phase. The demand for coton was at 14 million in the beginning of the year. It nudged up significantly to 31 million albeit a slight plunge in 2002. There was a diminutive disproportion in requesting cellulosic and wool between 1980 and 2000. Receding from 2 million to 1 million in the first 20 years, the rate of demand for fabric fibers rose diminutively in the amount to 10 million in 2015, while the opposite was true for wool dropped at the bottom at the same time.
To summarize, the amount of demanding for polyester as fabric fibers dominated at the end of the period. The rise and fall of coton, cellulosic and wool were dramatic in this graph.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | M10 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | kevann | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | quaan_ne | 78 | view |
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
.... Moreover, the amount of polyester was higher in size than coton in the final year. There we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75471698113 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69707395211 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7739713988 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207391277053 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082832341466 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613686951012 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131343858581 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311382907456 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.