proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA

Essay topics:

proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA

The graph shows the amount of increasing in proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA between 1940 and 2040.
In 1940, Japan allocated 5%, Sweden 7% and USA 9% proportion of population aged 65 and over. However, it is clearly seen that there has been a slight takeoff in USA and Sweden. They reached 10% of proportion almost in 1960, on the other hand, there has been a gradual decline in Japan at that period and remained stable at 2.5 from 1960 to 1985. After that period, there has been marginal increase and reached 10% of proportion in 2030.
In spite of some fluctuation in the expected percentage, the proportion of old people population continued to increase in the next two decades. While, there has been a sharp soar in Japan elderly people population and reached 25% in 2034. Thus, other two countries reached similar proportion with moderate speed in that period of time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-30 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-09-19 nobitaa 73 view
2024-09-14 dorae 73 view
2024-09-03 trpg143 70 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
Essays by user saeed_S_1368 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... proportion with moderate speed in that period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... moderate speed in that period of time.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, thus, while, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74213836478 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49919096122 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2443904877 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497820650794 0.215688989381 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249040216819 0.103423049105 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.2738107681 0.0843802449381 324% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.390171931621 0.15604864568 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185823095961 0.0819641961636 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.