Task 1: The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart gives the proportion of men, women and children consuming five portions of fruit and vegetables each day in the UK for 7 years, from 2001 to 2008.
Overall, there was the highest percentage of women who ate fruit and vegetables per day, while children had the lowest proportion in eating fruit and vegetables throughout the years. Furthermore, a significant increase in the percentage of people consuming fruit and vegetables can be seen obviously.
Although the proportion of women who ate fruit and vegetables started at just 20% in 2001, it increased dramatically for 5 years, to about 35% in 2006 before decreasing slightly to 30% in the last given year, 2008.
There was a significant increase in the percentage of children consuming fruit and vegetables to the peak at about 26% in 2007, after being constant at around 12% from 2001 to 2003. However, in 2008, it failed back to about 1% less than it used to be in the previous year, at 11%. Similarly, the rate of men who ate fruit and vegetable remained for the first 3 years, at around 17%, and started rising up to the highest percentage, at 27%, in 2006 and 2007 before going down to about 26% at last.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | cutecutecue | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | nami | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | prathamp114 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | rojababa | 73 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourists facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 89
- Task 2 Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis Wha are the reasons and what can be done to encourage them to spend their time walking 67
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause What are the solutions to address those problems 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68269230769 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66717319832 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.821779308 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.142857143 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340441951347 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173850035218 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103099482999 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238597704639 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959429663191 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.