The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The maps illustrate how transport system around City Hospital changed over the course of 3 years.
In general, there was substantial development in this place over these years. In particular, there were more car park, and bus station and roundabout have been built.
The most striking change is that roundabout was built in the junction between Hospital Rd and City Road, the other one was built in the junction between Hospital Rd and Ring Road. In addition, bus station was established in the west of Hospital Rd instead of using Bus stop along the path in the past.
The next remarkable transformation is that car park was separated into 2 areas, one of them was staff car park to the east of Hospital Rd, the second one was public car park to the east of City Hospital. In the year 2007, there just was a car park included staff and public vehicle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey on happiness ratings for married and unmarried people in the US and the effect of children on the overall ratings of married couples 95
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, in addition, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 706.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64473684211 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47714623359 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532894736842 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1103784224 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899373057968 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446322420953 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416819094881 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602511184513 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431954440084 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.