The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010

The given chart illustrates pathway access development to a city hospital between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, there was a considerable change in hospital street, particularly on the east and west sides. Even though there were two new additional established buildings, the city hospital remained the same.
In 2007, the city hospital located in the midpoint of the ring road. There was a T junction connected between the ring road and hospital road. For those who were preferred to use public transportation, six bus stops were available on both sides of the hospital road. The car park facility opened for the public and staff on the western side of the bus stops. A crossroad was joined between hospital and city road.
With regard to 2010, there was a significant development on the south side of the city hospital. T junction was demolished to be a roundabout connection. A new bus station centre was constructed in the southwest part of the city hospital. There was a private car park for staff on the west side of the hospital road, while personal car users should park their vehicle on the west side of the city hospital.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-07 ThHuong 78 view
2024-07-30 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
Essays by user afidahlia :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85492227979 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72893246612 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481865284974 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6071500373 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0833333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305211959066 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133058736626 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104816590291 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208081867421 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768701371792 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.