The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The maps illustrate the improvement in the road system access to the city hospital between a period of 3 years between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the road network was generally improved with the remarkable changes in the bus stop and car parks.
In 2007, the Hospital Road directly linked to the City Road, which was surrounded by two lines of trees. Then, both the public and hospital staff used the same small car park on the left of Hospital Road. In order to access the car park, people had to enter Ring Road, which ran around the hospital. Finally, the bus stop was constructed in the east of the hospital.
However, the road system transformed significantly 3 years later. The bus stop was relocated to the west of the Hospital Road and it also linked the two roundabouts, one in the north which connected to Ring Road and then, another in the south joining the City Road. The next improvement was the renovation of the car park which was reconstructed to become the staff car park. Moreover, there was also the construction of another car park for the public in the east of the City Hospital, linked to Ring Road.
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 67
- The maps below shoe the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62745098039 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48356767974 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6120198842 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306685845654 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138668192777 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128662797614 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217359232854 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128501530946 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.