1. Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the use of animals in experimentation has raised a controversial issue. Some people believe that animals are significant in testing new products and development of medicines while others argue that it is unethical and should be banned. In my opinion, banning animals testing is extremely necessary because of animals’ extinction and moral norms.
On the one hand, animal plays a significant role in developing new medicine. When scientists develop a new vaccine, for example, they have to test the effectiveness before it is mass-produced. Therefore, animals which share similarities in human gene will be the best example. If there are any problems or errors, scientists may have enough time to fix the problems before apply it on humans. Moreover, this not only apply in medicine but also in cosmetics as well. In fact, testing is the only way that scientist can examine how the body reacts to chemicals. If there is any skin irritation, they may change the formula to have the best quality products. Hence, animal testing is necessary evil in developing a new medicine.
On the other hand, using animals in experiments is against the moral norms. Undeniably, animals have right to live and against cruelty. However, they are injected with diseases to examine the effectiveness of a new drug. In some cases, they die as the result of the experiments or even are euthanized to avoid the later pain and distress. In addition, the more animals are used in studies, the greater they are extinct. In fact, millions of animals all over the world have been used in experimentation leading to a reduction in their quantity. Furthermore, it could cause imbalance in bio-diversity and the result in unpredictable. Thus, it is cruel to use animals in research and this must be stopped.
In conclusion, animals’ experimentations are advantageous for humans but avoidable. From my point of view, it is unethical and should be stopped before animals become disappear.
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- 1 Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of 61
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- 1 Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of 61
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animal suffer while others are in favour of the becaus 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... studies, the greater they are extinct. In fact, millions of animals all over the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15838509317 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06107380389 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531055900621 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4811643528 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.0952380952 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.04761904762 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391648768958 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111855141794 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108565152257 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248357332067 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138782309155 0.056905535591 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.