Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom Do you agree with this statement What is an alternative to traditional face to face teaching

Essay topics:

Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom.
Do you agree with this statement?
What is an alternative to traditional face-to-face teaching?

Technology is now increasingly prevalent in the world today so given time, it is thought that computer learning will take over the place of traditional learning in the classroom. This essay will state that despite advancing trends in Artificial intelligence, the teacher would perhaps continue to play an integral role in children's education. However, students can effectively use online courses via the internet should they choose not to attend classes.

Firstly, a teacher powered by AI would be less able to cater for students' individual needs such as providing feedback, constructive criticism and evaluation. Typically, children are known to have different personalities and learn at different pace sometimes requiring 'sticks' or 'carrots' or other forms of motivation to help them learn. Such is a quality only a human teacher possess as they have authority over the students. Also, students need the watchful eye of a teacher to make sure they are indeed understanding their lessons and not fooling around while learning. This is something a robotic teacher certainly cannot provide. For example, English study application is used to access vocabulary errors but is unable to sufficiently teach it users as it cannot offer such soft skills as explaining one's error or pointing out areas of weakness to learners.

Admittedly, the rising advances in AI has now made it possible for it to mimic the mental and physical abilities of a human being. For instance, the Da-Vinci robots available today is able to move and manipulate objects with human like precision. Nevertheless, these innovations have not yet reached a point where they can educate conpetently due to lacking pedagogical skills.

Alternatively, online courses via the internet can now be used, and this has provided access to unlimited materials and course-books that supplement and add to knowledge which children are assimilating from just listening to their teachers. Even so, it is the role of teachers to ensure that this remain a guided learning process and not just data gathering from internet sources that may be unreliable and misleading especially among younger children who may not be able to discriminate between sources and sift information properly. Furthermore, these courses are indispensable in long distance learning so that students now learn from expert teachers over the world. Many reputable institutions like Harvard, now offer convenient online education series to international students.

Overall, it appears that human teachers are set to remain an important part of Learning. Despite this the possibility of a robotic teacher in the future is a plausible arguement. Although, online courses are available to the student, it should be used carefully and under supervision of a competent educator.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-10 Yingr 73 view
2020-10-26 Sprios_D 78 view
2020-10-26 Marywonderlaw 78 view
2020-06-15 awele.O 84 view
2020-06-11 lyds 67 view
Essays by user awele.O :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hful eye of a teacher to make sure they are indeed understanding their lessons and not fooling around wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ot offer such soft skills as explaining ones error or pointing out areas of weakness...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, even so, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41647597254 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97681855625 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569794050343 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5501272988 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.578947368 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108560362925 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03584838446 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382338559025 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065296995537 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397382210694 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.