Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing. Why? How can this be controlled?
There is a widely-held view among people about the widespread use of cars has been created a wide range of detrimental impacts on the environment. There are several factors that can be held accountable for this trend, and I believe some measures can be applied to tackle this problem.
To begin with, financial reasons and lifestyle changes have led to an increase in cars consumption. Many countries have witnessed a growth in their economic development, which contributes to the same pattern in the average income of their citizens. Cars have become more affordable to purchase, and in developed countries, normally two or more members of a household are likely to have their own car. In terms of lifestyle, as cars are getting common, people drive their cars more than in the past for work, shopping and leisure. For instance, shopping malls and leisure complexes are usually sited outside urban centres, providing large parking areas to attract customers.
However, there are some effective and practical measures that should be considered to handle this problem from a governmental perspective. Firstly, it must be a governance priority to adopt standard emission policies that state the maximum amount of waste a person can produce. If violating this restriction, the individual will be monetary fined, or punished in the worst scenario. This action would cut down on the average amount of pollution from personal cars, collectively making a significant difference on a global scale. Secondly, the policymakers should relocate the country’s budget to improve the quality of infrastructure and public transportation, which encourages citizens to make the most of those rather than using individuals’ transports. This would minimize the pace of environmental degradation, acting as a stimulus to alleviate sustainable development if persisting in the long term.
In conclusion, it might seem sensible to me that many reasons ranging from financial to personal perspective can be accounted for the growth in car use. Meanwhile, there are substantial ways to address this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | bunxinh | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | rika205 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | congtran | 56 | view |
- The increasing use of mobile phones and computer has had a negative effect on young people s writing and reading skills Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community work (for example: working for a charity, teaching sports to children) should become a compulsory part of the high school curriculum. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that schools should teach students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Richer countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- Governments should make laws about people s nutrition and food choice Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...substantial ways to address this issue.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39143730887 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04600972385 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617737003058 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6683332933 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283901559919 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842262108186 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513614849158 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167756242375 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030615030211 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.