As country develop, more and more people buy and use their own car. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In recent years, there is an increasing number of people owning private cars thanks to the country modernization. Although car ownership may be beneficial to some extents, some of the drawbacks also need to be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, there are many advantages associated with having private cars. Firstly, owning personal cars is possibly more convenient than using public ones. The car owners are likely to maintain the flexibility in time, because they do not have to rely on fixed schedule. Therefore, squandering time at the station is not necessary for people owning personal cars. Secondly, cars ownership helps in ensuring the safety among users. For example, pickpockets are likely to make use of the crowds on the public transportations to steal personal belongings. So that, having personal cars might prevent those social crimes as much as possible.
On the other hand, car ownership could have certain negative aspects. Private cars would adversely affect the environment. To illustrate, gasoline, used for manipulating the car, is regarded as dirty fuel. When a massive amount of exhaust fumes is emitted into the air, it would culminate in air contamination. Additionally, the grow of traffic congestion is one of the disadvantages of owning personal cars. Ho Chi Minh city, which is a densely populated area, has witnessed a significant increase in using personal cars. During the rush hour, the cars line up taking up space. As a result, commuting becomes much more challenging to the residents during peak hour.
In conclusion, while having private cars is beneficial to owners for the convenience and having safer means of transport, having a detrimental effect on environment and traffic jam require some strategies to tackle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | chino0301 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that it is acceptable to use animals for benefit of human Others however believe t is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is acceptable to use animals for benefit of human Others however believe it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- These days more and more people are going to other countries for a significant period of time either to find a job or to study There are main benefits to doing this but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties Discuss the advantages AND disa 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ship may be beneficial to some extents, some of the drawbacks also need to be taken into co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
... on the public transportations to steal personal belongings. So that, having personal cars might pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ate in air contamination. Additionally, the grow of traffic congestion is one of the dis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28014184397 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94580126337 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4016198974 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7222222222 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181205209396 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583960522837 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499224545684 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102092211591 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487830385012 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ship may be beneficial to some extents, some of the drawbacks also need to be taken into co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
... on the public transportations to steal personal belongings. So that, having personal cars might pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ate in air contamination. Additionally, the grow of traffic congestion is one of the dis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28014184397 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94580126337 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4016198974 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7222222222 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181205209396 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583960522837 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499224545684 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102092211591 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487830385012 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.