Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the era of industrialization, along with developments of technology are the increase in environmental issues. While some people believe that living simpler is the way to solve these problems, others argue that technology is the answer to the solution. Despite agreeing that living simpler considerably improves the environment, I do also believe that technology should be applied to tackle its troubles.
On the one hand, I suppose that living simpler lives decreases environmental issues. Nowadays, because of industrial life, by burning fossil fuels for factories, the power, and transportation sectors, carbon dioxide is produced and causes climate change. Consequently, this contributes to global warming, which leads to serious calamity occurrences, such as rising sea levels due to thermal expansion and melting of glaciers and ice sheets, forest fires and the sudden appearance of pests and diseases.
On the other hand, some people, as well as me, believe that technology is the way to handle environmental matters. In particular, renewable energy technology is a notorious proof. Wind turbines, solar power, and hydroelectric power offer alternative sources of energy that are safe, affordable, efficient and especially, renewable. These resources might gradually replace fossil fuels due to their sustainability and environmental friendliness. Besides, smart houses are one of the examples of the contribution of technology to solve environmental issues. The home is one of the biggest energy users, but new technologies are helping to change that. Devices like smart thermostats and motion-activated lighting make it easier to only use power when you need it, which saves both money and energy.
In conclusion, although living simpler is one of the efficient ways to decrease harmful damages to the environment, I do believe that technology plays an important role in finding a solution for environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-14 | phuongkhanh_2645 | 66 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | paramveersingh | 73 | view |
| 2017-01-18 | Binh_nguyen | 82 | view |
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think young leaders would be better Do you agree or disagree 78
- As people travel around the world quickly and often the spreading chance of viruses and diseases has increased How can governments organizations and individuals prepare for the future outbreak and epidemic 79
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 66
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be applied to tackle its troubles. On the one hand, I suppose that living s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dden appearance of pests and diseases. On the other hand, some people, as well ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it, which saves both money and energy. In conclusion, although living simpler i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, so, well, while, i suppose, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62328767123 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24898038194 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3686945477 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308235740649 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111637128408 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948120917893 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193551658138 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104126414385 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.