Do the advantages of using networks at work outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, it is fact that social network is one of the most multifunction tools for labor environment, in which there are more companies apply high-tech equipment into their work. Despite some obvious disadvantages of this trend, I would agree that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, it is clear that social networks would bring about several negative aspects. One evident strength is that it would reduce the work performance each employee, such as employees who constantly refresh Facebook, send tweets on Twitter every few hours and watch Instagram stories several times a day are not working to their fullest potential. In other words, the possibility of the company network being exposed to malware, for instance hackers can launch spam or commit fraud through some social media platforms. This can be massively dangerous for the business and potentially damage for organization’s networks or computers with security breaches or the corruption of important files.
On the other hand, I argue that there are some obvious positive aspects of social networks would prove to be worthwhile. First, it creates the effective communication between employees and managers like thanks to a social network we are able to bring in a new channel of interaction that may allow for certain topics to be better addressed. Second, through social media sites, our employees can strengthen professional relationships with people outside the company. Then, these relationships can lead to opportunities that would otherwise not have been available. More and better connections may result in sales leads, interest in employment, business opportunities, and new ideas. Consequently, coworkers can use social media to interact with one another and build better relationships. A stronger relationship among employees leads to more cohesive and productive work teams. Social media is an easy way to encourage communication between employees and help to share ideas and increase engagement both while at work and at home.
In conclusion, there is downside to apply social networks at work. However, it seems to me that its upside would be more important regarding the efficient transmission information, the professional connections and the personal relationships between each employee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 88
- The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25-year-olds in London during yhr 1990s and 2010s and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods. 84
- Effects And Solutions to Global Warming 84
- young people should spend more time on cultural activities such as music and theatre and less time on sport. how far do you agree with this statement? 73
- What are advantages and disadvantages of watching TV 97
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52407932011 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07977745482 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57223796034 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2986839581 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176417881383 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621899588831 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624142739073 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11647941433 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213714506243 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.