Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend? What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time?
Everyone believes that friendship is a gift of almighty that can make our lives memorizing. However, maintaining friendship sometimes is difficult just like pulling teeth because of the complexities, which arise in humans' lives. Hence, people who are non-judgmental and loyal can maintain long lasting friendship, while persons who are disrespectful and dishonest often give up friendships.
On one hand, two major qualities of an awesome friend might be non-judgmental and loyal in friendship. First of all, a friend should be supportive towards other friends by listening the problems without making any sort negative of judgement, solving the specific constraints and always protecting friends from bullies that might arise from other people around the locality where they live. For instance, a recent study conducted by Dr. B.J. Ghosh at University of Ghana stated that people reduced 76.45% of stress by sharing their problems with friends in Togo. Another aspect could be loyalty to maintain a healthy friendship, being faithful to friends, supporting during struggling etc. Hence, it can be stated that being non-judgmental and loyal are essential in maintaining healthy friendship.
On the other hand, being disrespectful and dishonest might create complexities in maintaining friendship. Firstly, when friends do not show respect to each other and try to humiliate frequently, they might face difficulties to continue friendship. In addition to that friendship might fall in jeopardy if friends are dishonest to each other, meaning that they often hide truth, lie and create confusions. For example, a team of professor of University of West Canada found that 89.11% of the friendships ended because of lies while studying adults of Ontario in Canada. Therefore, it is undoubtedly noted that being disrespectful and dishonest are the significant qualities that weaken a relationship.
In conclusion, friendship is a blessing to mankind, but maintaining friendship sometimes is challenging. Hence, people should choose friends who are non-judgmental and loyal, while they should avoid people who are disrespectful and dishonest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-26 | Nguyễn Tiết Nghi | 63 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | JAY9923 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | join2saurav | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | patel38 | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-16 | riteeshk | 56 | view |
- Some schools put the most advanced students in separate classes from their peers so they can study more challenging materials Do the advantages of this practice outweigh the disadvantages 79
- In modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face to face contract with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 78
- Social media has many positive uses, but there have been some negative consequences to it as well. Identify a problem caused by social media and describe the solutions you would propose to address this problem. 89
- In many developing countries, there is a problem with declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this? 67
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special but also very complicated What are the qualities of a great friend What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ch arise in humans lives. Hence, people who are non-judgmental and loyal can maintain l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat might arise from other people around the locality where they live. For instan...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ng. Hence, people should choose friends who are non-judgmental and loyal, while they sh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6439628483 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11347069013 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547987616099 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8325454478 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.533333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165015810228 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685987763151 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407122057224 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101698761504 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335069874845 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.