If old people are no longer physically, mentally or financially able to look after themselves, younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the young of the family bear legal accountability of caring for the elderly that have no more capability of fending for themselves. From my perspective, I oppose this assertion due to the lack of younger members’ care and the presence of nursing homes.
To begin with, the viewpoint of young family members being mandated to assist their elderly relatives is objected to because of their insufficient ability of looking after. In effect, each household’s circumstances and capacities vary significantly. For example, some young family members are low or middle income earners, which increase their financial burdens and fail to give their parents alternative treatment. Furthermore, to integrate the fast pace of life, most young members have to bury themselves into work, which they cannot spend quality time with their old family members. As a result, the elderly cannot receive holistic support, and it might increase their sense of isolation.
Additionally, the existence of nursing homes is aimed at the complex senior care if their children are not able to provide. In a nursing home, all your loved one’s needs are met, regardless of the time of the day. High quality nursing facilities make them feel safe and comfortable with the homelike setting. They can also participate in in-house activities such as crafts, fitness and entertainment, and befriend other people. Therefore, not only seniors become more jovial, but young family members are assisted to take care of their parents.
In conclusion, young family members should not be in charge of looking after seniors legitimately. It is because of their inadequate care provision and nursing homes ubiquity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | thuthao2000 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | Dương Viết Phương Huyền | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | cupinsiuway | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Amanda Helen | 78 | view |
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on other important subjects Discuss in both views and give your opinion 61
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels Is this a positive or negative development 67
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34572490706 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84663713195 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7905293303 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179290092615 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601181801837 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613408382097 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117048750076 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415204322321 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.