Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that with the development of electrical divides, public libraries now become unnecessary and should be replaced by computer technology. In this essay, we could take a close look at both aspects before demonstrating that public libraries are an essential feature of society setting and could not be removed.
Computers have shaped our life since they have become public in early 2000s. Major of population have personal computers, laptops and smart divides which are connected to the internet, applying us to access to the free information conveniently. So, e-book and online resources have sprung up as a trend of society development. Because of that, sharing, searching and reading digital resources by using computer technology have become easier and faster. However, computers could be hacked easily. By opening a file with the included harmful codes could destroy your databases or expose your personal information such as: bank account, your e-mail password and so on. Besides that, there are an array of distractions could interrupt us from reading and the bad materials affect the young generations negatively.
On the other hand, as the basic function of library is to store the information, the public libraries provide both safely physical and digital resources. In fact, there are some people who tend to read e-books, whereas, the others still enjoy physical books. While books are getting expensive, libraries apply the equal access for poor person and improve their education. On top of that, the library resources seem to be safer than the online resources, providing readers a good environment to do their work without any harms or distractions.
In summary, public libraries have played an irreplaceable role in our society setting and could not be replaced by computer technology
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | iceber9 | 82 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | nagakhoa | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | KatherineLQ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | hin07 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Hau Nguyen | 84 | view |
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use What are your views 92
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'arrays'?
Suggestion: arrays
...d and so on. Besides that, there are an array of distractions could interrupt us from...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, so, still, whereas, while, in fact, in summary, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32986111111 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77057877903 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1783598119 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178497513044 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636632650226 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579192098511 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125426830241 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424440028491 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.