Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
There are some controversial perspectives heating a debate over the fact that an enormous amount of commodity is imported by a wealth of nations from distinct sectors in the world. Obviously, this phenomenon has both pros and cons, yet the advantages still outweigh its counterpart.
Nowadays, with the prominence of trading goods, importation plays a paramount role in our daily life in each country. By supplying various kinds of food, the food shortage is gradually diminished. In fact, in some countries, not only unsuitable weather conditions but also barren soil prevent peasants from cultivating some certain food, thus importation is an optimal way to solve the problem. Singapore can be cited as underlying and convincing example. Moreover, the more sources of intake are transported to a country the more choices customers have. Now, buyers are able to taste a bunch of different food with a wide range of prices. Therefore, all walks of life could afford the foods.
While the redeeming features of food imported are widely acknowledged, the downside of that still linger. As the matter of course, conveying food over distinct nations can have adverse impacts on the environment. Since almost imported goods is shipped by planes or trains which are powered by conventional energies such as coal, gas,… massive exhaust emissions are created and directly released to environment. Thus, it escalates the contamination of air quality.
In conclusion, although importing food from other countries wreak havoc on environmental quality, it is undisputable that the tremendous benefits it brings can tackle acute shortage of food and offer customers more choices. However, I believe that eco-friendly means of transportation should be applied to reduce the air pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-25 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 56 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport However it is no longer the main form of transport What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population 84
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefit is in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Today people are getting greedy and selfish Some people argue that we should go back the old days and show respect for the family and community so that we can make the world a better place to live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... conventional energies such as coal, gas,… massive exhaust emissions are created a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41007194245 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98773435841 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661870503597 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9252157055 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21596512905 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056401645849 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545562360026 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124093283771 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282105671034 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.