Many manufactured food and drinks products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to courage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
The production of edibles containing large amounts of sugar results to various health problems likewise obesity, diabetes and blood pressure. Currently this sugary products are manufactured and sold with the same prices as the other non sugary products. In my opinion, increasing the price of sweets won't have any long term beneficial outcomes and also it develops riots and objections from all hierarchies of the society.
Firstly, vast amount of people depend on low priced sugary goods. As they provide sufficient energy for their daily routine life. When considerable growth in prices emerges, majority of sugar addicted workforce loose their mainly source of energy.
Also social values alter with economic strategies and sugary products would be considered as luxurious food available for richer hierarchies just like before renaissance era, when fat people were acknowledged as rich people. As a matter of fact, the demand of these products would experience a dramatic growth and therefore companies manufacturing sweet goods become great players of a country's economy.
Thirdly, most people address this kind of forcing restrictions as human rights violation. Sweetness is a major part of human tastes which effects on increasing the brain hormones in order to calm down and relax. Accessing the crucial sweetness for every human is undoubtedly a must. Thus prohibiting sugary products would conclude to huge protests and riots involving no only fat people, also thin and muscular individuals as well.
In conclusion, the suggestion of price raise on sweet goods in as absord idea with devastating results. Due to the necessity of sugar for Humans ecological state, economic shifts in regards to sugar companies and social potential of conflicts, ideal performance from mentioned suggestion is impossible. Many scientists believe that alternative lifestyles and diet programs can maintain better consequences in people's health issues. Researching and obtaining the obsticles ahead of social health immunity is the first step the problem. Then better solutions can be concluded frome the data.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- the number of passengers travelling by train in sydney
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment sis necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and 56
- Is prevention better than cure 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices emerges, majority of sugar addicted workforce loose their mainly source of e...
^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
..., majority of sugar addicted workforce loose their mainly source of energy. Also s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... loose their mainly source of energy. Also social values alter with economic strat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...umans ecological state, economic shifts in regards to sugar companies and social potential of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, likewise, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, in conclusion, kind of, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53726708075 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78998336476 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6186552958 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.882352941 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206499573927 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561256497946 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487485815207 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103567350567 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395975200116 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.