Many people prefer to spend their money and not save it.
What are the reasons?
Is this a positive or negative development?
The societal phenomenom in spending more money while saving it less is on the rise. Such manner is happened due to the increasing of daily needs and poor financial management, resulting in complex negative impact such as leading to poorer generation.
The prominent cause of spending-addict and less money-saving behaviours are basic goods that is increasing in this technological society while having little management in finance, such as purchasing cell-phone, computers, and cars. Compared to decades before, it is not necessary to buy technologies since everything is done conventionally, but this modern era required its citizens to life with computer-based. Thus, it fosters to more purchasement while financial citizens has not been thought more. According to University of Indonesia research on indonesian spending in recent decades, it is showed that
In conclusion, purchasement-addiction and minimum saving are now being a trend because the rising basic needs and the decreasing money management occur. Poorer next generation might happened as thhe negative effect of this, so it is suggested to individual to learn financial-spending.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | tienallen' | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | Jamshidbek | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | Jamshidbek | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | Jamshidbek | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | jashan2407 | 73 | view |
- In many countries youngsters are more aggressive and disrespectful now compared to the past Why is this happening What can be done to improve the situation 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- it is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishmt is necessary to help them learn this distinction agree or disagree what punishment shoul parents and teachers be alowed to teach good behavior 61
- Pie graphs show nutritional consistency of two dinners 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in recent decades, it is showed that In conclusion, purchasement-addiction an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 172.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81976744186 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55583505705 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9684525716 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162671403337 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750610608063 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535220794611 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112511928045 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00422936412416 0.056905535591 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.