The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010.
The two maps illustrates the development and changes in the stokeford village last year over the period of 80 year.
Overall, we can see that in the first map was less developed, consisting of fewer farming area. On the other hand pedestrian area more construct.
If we look at the development east of the city centre, it can be seen that the retirement house knocked down to make way for a new large houses, and the farm house just east of this area were replaced by roads. Further north bridge was remainly same in the planed, and by 2010, a primary school had been enlarge in its place.
In the centre itself, the main road was pedestrianised, and in the place of shops new road built up for passenger and the residential area redevelop in the north east of town forest, which was cut down after 1995. following that the river stock and post office were remainly same in the site particularly, respectively. Whoever, where as shops was converted into big malls of the town as well as in the centre of the city develop a large garden.
- Government should free the fees ogmf university. It is a valuable improvement. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertisements because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Advantages and disadvantages 56
- The graph below shows the average montly salary and the prices of white television. 11
- Life cycle of frog . 89
- The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'house'?
Suggestion: house
...nocked down to make way for a new large houses, and the farm house just east of this a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enlarged'.
Suggestion: enlarged
... and by 2010, a primary school had been enlarge in its place. In the centre itself, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
... forest, which was cut down after 1995. following that the river stock and post office we...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...te particularly, respectively. Whoever, where as shops was converted into big malls of t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 1615.20841683 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 188.0 315.596192385 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53191489362 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5254028539 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6563149109 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0594773791419 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273173514155 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388312096111 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.045732667135 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404718909537 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.