More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive trend?
It is common that many people are interested in buying products from famous brands. This trend happens because of some factors, and it can have some adverse impacts on individuals and society.
Many people like to purchase products from famous companies because of several reasons. Firstly, because these products are globally recognized for their quality, customers would not need to worry when they buy goods. As a result, the guarantee that what they buy performs well or has excellent customer services. For example, people who buy products from Apple could fix their devices anywhere in the world. Secondly, more people want to possess materialistic things to show off their status and wealth, which helps them feel more confident. For instance, many youths spend vast sums of money purchasing luxury cars or expensive watches, which shows that they are fashionable and cool.
However, this trend could bring a range of negative effects. First, because consumers waste a large amount of money on items with well-known names, these people would end up with thousands of dollars in debt. If they buy products from local brands, they would save more money. Furthermore, more people tend to buy products from big and famous companies, which leads to destroying small brands. As a result, these local brands could not sell their products. For example, Apple and Samsung dominate the phone markets in Vietnam, so Vsmart finds it difficult to buy their products.
In conclusion, more customers liking to purchase branded merchandise is caused by several elements, and this trend might bring about some impacts.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-10 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 78 | view |
2021-09-29 | Pau Nguyen | 84 | view |
2020-10-09 | kchocielts | 81 | view |
2020-08-11 | aidaaaa | 89 | view |
2019-04-14 | tda | 78 | view |
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows information about the consumption of different types of fast food per person per week in England between 1980 and 2000 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 67
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by luck Do you agree or disagree 56
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e globally recognized for their quality, customers would not need to worry when t...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of money on items with well-known names, these people would end up with thousands...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2471042471 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44440883218 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5458965002 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24579237572 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820927843446 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525772850521 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157440181511 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244892067645 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.