Most societies have its homeless people. Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money. To what extent do you agree?
It is true that there are many homeless people in most countries around the world. However, some individuals believe that providing a financial assistance is the most effective to tackle their problem. From my point of view, I maintain that we should not support idea.
To begin with, giving money to the homeless people makes them more poverty-stricken on account of the misuse of finance in bad deeds. According to a report done by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 6 out of 10 homeless inhabitants admit to use charity money to purchase alcohol or drugs. Furthermore, as they do not know how to save money, if they are given financial support, they will disperse it rapidly. This tendency to spend on short-term needs urges the homeless to easily fall into drug and alcohol addiction.
To handle this global issue, the government should take care of the citizens without home by assisting their essential demands. Indeed, the major of the homeless citizens have the desire to get a stable job and a long-term home as well as medical support. Therefore the country can allocates money from the budget to attract the homeless residents into work. For instance, in some developed countries such as Singapore and Japan, encourage them to work by providing food, cloth and accommodation to clean the streets. Consequently, their living conditions have improved significantly and it is impossible to see any beggar in these countries.
In conclusion, cash assistance to beggars not only does not help them to be more prosperous, but also makes them more prone to fall into social evils. It is suggestible that despite the effectiveness in some aspects, the issue of homelessness will achieve tremendous improvements by the efforts of the government and the whole community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | Dayo | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | vuthuy2210 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-17 | hamresh | 81 | view |
| 2017-06-02 | grahamoneil | 70 | view |
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 89
- The charts show the percentage of volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2014 84
- Most societies have its homeless people Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money To what extent do you agree 84
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 65
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...g-term home as well as medical support. Therefore the country can allocates money from th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0813559322 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89659777248 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3840593881 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232413653205 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691527219952 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589076306971 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12843508945 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228583301788 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.