Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in international tourism. Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, whether global tourism is advantageous or not has become a fiercely controversial issue. Some people assert that international tourism is helpful to local societies because of its benefits, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that the tourism industry exerts positive effects on local societies. An obvious advantage is that the travel sector usually enables residents who live in tourist cities to obtain more employment opportunities, compared to others in common cities. In addition, it often leads to economic growth in a multitude of tourist cities, such as Paris, London and Venice. To exemplify, one recent study conducted by a university in France illustrates that the gross regional domestic product of Paris has increased since it has become a well-known city among travelers. Researchers analyzed a number of causes of this social phenomenon and the main cause turned out to be tourism. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for several of the arguments in favour of global tourism.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that the tourist industry merely brings with it positives. Perhaps the most oft-cited argument against such a view is that the number of tourists who commit acts of vandalism has increased. To illustrate, a notable cultural heritage site, which is located in South Korea, designated by UNESCO had a myriad of bird species in the past. However, most of them disappeared after many tourists, who did not preserve the environment in that area, visited that place. Furthermore, some tourist cities’ economy revolves around the money spent by tourists. Thus, the hospitality industry plays an important role in local cities, which cause some local residents to be less likely to adapt to this change. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 47
- QQ4 Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Q3 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- Q2 Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37741046832 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94672109914 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625344352617 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6894413434 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.736842105 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161446557265 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433416202199 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525311882293 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917485191136 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577195566792 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.