Q9. With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas?
Recently, the issue of resources has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some disadvantages to developing untouched land in order to secure fossil fuels, such as crude oil and gas, these are exceeded by the advantages, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that people should not make use of undamaged spaces in a bid to obtain energy sources do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that developing untouched places poses a threat to the environment given that being equipped with a multitude of facilities helping developers to produce fossil fuels with greater ease is unavoidable. In addition, destroying a myriad of natural habitats to get fossil fuels can lead various species of animals and plants that should be protected in order to keep biodiversity to become extinct, which can exert a detrimental influence on human beings who are on the top of food chains.
My opinion, however, is that mankind can reap a number of advantages from developing untouched land to gain fossil fuels. Perhaps the principal benefit is that fossil fuels are economical given that generating renewable energy sources, such as tidal power and solar power, costs a fortune. In addition, fossil fuels make it possible for numerous citizens across the globe to have an improved standard of living as fossil fuels facilitate various aspects of people's daily lives with greater ease. To provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for making an effort to develop natural areas to create fossil fuels, human beings would have difficulty facilitating various aspects of their daily lives from operating businesses to commuting to and from work. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the benefits of developing untouched areas so as to acquire energy sources surpass the drawbacks for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | Trần Thị Ngọc Mai | 73 | view |
- X 89
- Q10 Developments in technology cause environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- X 89
- Q4 Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Q15 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... benefits of developing untouched areas so as to acquire energy sources surpass the draw...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16438356164 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73670518391 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8578154396 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.642857143 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213461632173 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608675021116 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566473150906 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122132322628 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196957066258 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.