In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Within the recent few decades, humanity has witnessed tremendous modifications involving living philosophy and human rights, which has also brought to an alternative family model. This essay will discuss such changes as well as evaluate its role in bettering a family.
The aforementioned change that could be witnessed in the new housing structure is the family size. As time past, relatives groups had decreased from broad, massive extended families with multiple generations living under the shared roof to a more remarkable smaller size, typically nuclear families with 4-5 members. The population within a house has also changed, that is parents are more and more inclined to having only 1 or 2 children, as compared with 5-6 children in the former eras. Another major transformation is that nowadays, women have gained equal rights and significance as men used to have, whereas the inferiority is true for the female’s roles few decades ago.
I believe all of these transitions in the family complex are advancements. First and foremost, as family capacity reduced, parents’ responsibilities reduce, and they would meet the higher likelihood of providing their children with a better living environment. Following this, the alternative in family functions has successfully verified the importance of the maternal position as well as the sense of gender equality. Women are now given the equivalent power as men; they have the rights to be the family’s breadwinner and the financial managing authority, whereas men now can pursue their desire occupations despite former social prejudice on the husbands’ appearance of “dominance” and “masculinity”, such as homemaking. All these improvements could be considered as a progress towards a more humane community.
In conclusion, there has been numerous positive changes toward the base of building families, generally in the size and the equal roles of wives and husbands and I believe this progression will subsequences in the ultimate utopian model of family.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-08 | nguyenhuynhnhu233 | 73 | view |
2021-10-07 | mimio5 | 89 | view |
2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
2021-09-06 | Amna Zeeshan | 56 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 84
- There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades While some people see this as a positive trend which raises the general level of education within the community others fear that it is lowering the q 95
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 772, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...ese improvements could be considered as a progress towards a more humane community. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51118210863 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12468230683 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4992006349 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.75 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231292519212 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876973419802 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668980817857 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136023478888 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198505530421 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.