In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
In this day and age, there are many familial structure innovations to be more suitable with the modern lifestyle. In my point of view, I believe that these changes are really suitable and constructive at least in this modernized world.
The rapid change of the world has led to the course of human race lifestyle, especially in family structure as well as the role of members in a family. Firstly, the types of different family structures have become more varied, people have more types such as single parent family, childless family, step family, etc.. These patterns stem from the adaptation of society to the current world, where engagement is not strict like in the past so the two parent family has not been the most popular pattern. Secondly, the roles and duties of each member in a family has transformed more flexibly. For instance in the past, husbands tended to work and earn money to support the financial aspect in a family, but now, wives can wholly do the same things or both of them can do it together as long as it is appropriate with their circumstances.
Objectively, to live in the modernization of the world, these changes are completely reasonable. Adaptation of humanity is the first reason for this reasonableness. Everything on the earth has been changing promptly such as science, technology, etc. so people also need to continuously adjust their lives in the possible way in order to have a superior one thereby the transformation of family structures is necessary. Moreover, these changes indirectly confine the increased overpopulation. There are new structures just having a few members in a family like childless family and homosexual family, they are prone to not nourish children or adopt abandoned infants. Eventually, these adjustments bring a load of benefits for people.
To conclude, many transformations have emerged in recent years and maybe there will be new ways of change in the future. Yet, in my perspective now, these adjustments still yield lots of advantages and totally are not detrimental to humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | nguyenhuynhnhu233 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | mimio5 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Amna Zeeshan | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 78
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 73
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...mily, childless family, step family, etc.. These patterns stem from the adaptation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, at least, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06176470588 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93396026513 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5842936941 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311793818649 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10161007604 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666496994273 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181754867553 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444156474015 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.