Recently we are facing increasing number of cars, which poses a great threat to the pedestrians and cyclists. What’s more, a lot of parks need to be sacrificed as a result of the construction of railways and superhighways. Do you agree or disagree? What do you think is the best solution to satisfy residents to their heart’s content?
In recent years, it is unquestionable that the development of global economy and high tech has been variably associated with numerous severe social issues. Ever-increasing number of cars commuting on streets and the constructions of railways and superhighways are the two emerging problems. These, of course, cause a lot of troubles to residents, thereby, plausible approaches need to be made to solve these problems once and for all.
Firstly, great threats to pedestrians and cyclists can be seen from the growth of number of cars. With huge sizes, cars always occupy a lot space in the parking lot or pavements, which creates the feeling of uncomfort and inconvenience to pedestrians. More importantly, drivers may cause injury to pedestrians incidentally when they move their cars out of the pavements since both of them fail to watch their way carefully. With regard to cyclists, a high volume of cars travelling on streets makes them find it hard to watch out obstacles on streets, which in some cases lead to accidents. Therefore, to tackle these problems, I belive it is the government’s responsibility to reduce to amount of cars, perhaps by raising tax on cars. Also, government should provide intensive training courses for drivers before allowing them drive on streets, making travelling much safer.
Secondly, the destruction of parks to pave a way to build infrastructure such as railways and superhighways is detrimental. Residents in these areas are without doubt affected since they no longer have a place of refreshment and entertainment. For example, children at tender ages who always long to take part in outdoor activities which also are considered vital for their physical and psychological development, now are confined in their apartments. Besides, sacrificing parks for building roads also result in air pollution since there are no trees left to absorb carbon-dioxide and gas emissions from vehicles travelling on a daily basis. Hence, it is imperative to adopt solutions in order to deal these issues. It is recommended that government and planners should have a suitable strategy towards these road constructions without destroying parks.
In conclusion, the two aforementioned problems can all be solved effectively once governments adopt suitable solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | tramtram4700 | 89 | view |
| 2017-03-12 | Rosemary09 | 67 | view |
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. Agree or disagree? 90
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The world natural resources are being consumed at an ever increased rate What are the dangers of this situation What should we do 81
- Nowadays, more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 55
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, if, incidentally, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, in some cases, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42061281337 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20546133155 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607242339833 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1990270622 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179821261445 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053523809703 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505816562048 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913515944359 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502388445002 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.