Responsible tourists could preserve both the local culture and the environment. Some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree
There is a common belief that indigenous culture and environment could be conserved by well-mannered tourists, while others hold the view that being a responsible visitor is impossible. From my perspective, there are both positive and negative impacts of this issue.
On the one hand, there are some advantages for the native culture and nature that are needed to be concerned about. Firstly, local culture is protected and developed by responsible tourists because of donating and ameliorating. For instance, Bat Trang village is a traditional village in Vietnam for making and trading hand-made potteries but it has been modified currently with some modern constructions due to the support of tourism. Secondly, occupational opportunities also are created in terms of services for the locals and they have the responsibility to preserve cultural specificity through the enhancement of tourism. As a consequence, the local life will be improved and get better and their awareness will be raised.
On the other hand, irresponsibility happens with some people and almost unable to change. First and foremost, despite mandatory regulations, tourists still do whatever they want and break the rule. For example, chewing gums and littering are banned in a cleaned city such as Singapore but some reverse actions occurred under the laws. Furthermore, understanding completely about one’s culture is not always possible because some specific information sometimes is not found on the internet. If a visitor came to a region and infringe local rules, native people would not feel welcome and comfortable.
To sum up, responsible tourists play an important role in cultural development and conserving the environment by supporting and creating more chances for the areas but knowing totally about the regulations is not possible in some situations. Personally, through visiting places, raising awareness of local region where they are visiting are necessary in order to improve tourism around the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-11 | Phạm Thùy Linh | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | Phạm Thùy Linh | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Anoopben | 79 | view |
- Topic in some countries many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Topic in some countries many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Some university students move away and live on their own while they are attending school but others live at home with their family while they are students Which do you think is a better choice Give reasons to explain your answer 89
- Amount spent on comsumer goods 73
- Topic The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world Some people think that this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of having only o 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51623376623 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04343070959 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1089163535 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297259428121 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923001889787 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649342532534 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167482687692 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02890025458 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.