School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that trainer should have responsible for intellectual skill growth of children rather than parents or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with example and good illustration and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people Who believe that tutor are responsible for social and intellectual development of students. They have been highly crucial role in children life as a god. Firstly, the teachers had trained in the intellectual growth of courses who are psychological learnt behaviour of children. According to my perspective, children have been gained moral values and how to make good ettiqutes in own his life. Moreover, that is learnt for the helps of trainers. The best epitome of this is the United state of America is compulsory taught lesson of ettiqutes for all school children. It is better way to development of children good habits.
On the other hand, parents are wherever, responsible for good intelluctual skill build up in the children life. First and foremost point is children are genetically depend upon behaviour of parents, especially, parents are understood behaviour and habits of children. They have memorable and loveable person in childhood life however, children do not agree with parents. It is bad impact and update attitude level in children because, it is gap new- generation in between parents. A good illustration this is the psychologist theory is written by gean Piaget say that children behavior genetically on parents behaviour.
To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing both the options; I believe that there is no single conclusion still; I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands therefore undoubtedly, parents is responsible for developed intellectual skill in the children life however, teachers is responsible because, tutors have punished the student for bad etiquettes and good growth of intellectual skills other hand, parents do not punshied own her children because every child is memorable and loveable part of parents life.
- A person's worth nowadays seen to be judge according to social status and material possessions .old fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust no longer seen important. To what extent agree or disagree? 61
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via internet and live with any face to face contact with others is it a positive or negative development in your opinion To what extent do you support this development 41
- The chart below shows figures for attendances at hospital emergency care departments in Northern Ireland by age group in December 2016 and December 2017. 67
- The first chart show how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart show how green house gas emission takes place summarize the information and give main relevant point and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Many people say that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects equally. Others however, believe that students should spend more time on subjects they like, or are good at. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...emost point is children are genetically depend upon behaviour of parents, especially, ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and loveable part of parents life.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23237597911 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91895729325 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522193211488 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.205000354 49.4020404114 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185114293741 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057522322498 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628426334536 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116994317725 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331589738544 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.