Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of international organization rather than each national government.
Nowadays, when the disadvantage consequences of destroying habitat have emerged, solving environmental problems have gradually becoming one of vital aim to human. Therefore, there is an argument about the responsibility for dealing with environmental issues is belong to international organization rather than each national government. In my point of view, both should combine to handle this matter. This essay will detail the grounds for my perspective.
On the one hand, damage to natural ecosystem is global concern so international organization should spend more attention to find measures to relieve this problem. For example, international organization can spread news and solvable means related to this vital problem on television, radio or any other kind of media. Especially, the present development of technology is occupying a noticeable role in transmission message to youth. Thereby, news via
social network sites are easy to approach citizen in different countries. Not only that international organization should fund for charity activities about conserving natural source.
On the other hand, each national government must take responsibility for their influence to Earth. Because in my opinion, the root of those disadvantageous consequences resulted from actions of people and lack of appropriate policy in each country. If government didn’t enact advisable law for the deeds that devastated survival of animals and habitat, all of that would lead to serious effect to human. Therefore, administrator of each national country ought to regard more about aspect of environment in their country. In order to having fitting punishment for residents who have wrongdoing.
In conclusion, balance between international organization and national government can create impact dramatically in dealing and improving the present depressive circumstance of the earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | Amanda Helen | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-27 | minhtran224 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | HuyenAnh | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-31 | Nguyễn Thị Bích | 48 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
- Some people think children s spending time on TV video and PC games is good while others think it Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of international organization rather than each national government 78
- If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that travelling to work and working in the company s buildings makes employees more productive However other argue that it is better for employees to work at home Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...or dealing with environmental issues is belong to international organization rather th...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion message to youth. Thereby, news via social network sites are easy to approac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83636363636 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27235553444 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8517101505 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346514267842 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940495744363 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942952787463 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16738032315 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661223156178 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.