Some children can learn more efficiently by watching TV. Therefore, children should watch TV regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree?.
In contemporary life, TV is being considered as an indispensable tool, especially in children. It is argued that watching TV on a daily basis would facilitate children to study better. In my opinion, I totally agree with this point of view.
To begin with, equipping TV at school is so necessary to help children learn more effectively. With teachers using TV combine textbooks in teaching would make the lessons more interesting and wonderful. In recent years, they might use a TV as a mini computer. Taking history lessons as an example, history textbooks always cover a great number of the historic eras with numbers which is hard to remember for students. Teachers must use these textbooks to assist in their teaching. However, thanks to television, students could watch historical documentaries with wonderful video, helping students easier to remember numbers as well as historical eras and learn more efficiently.
Secondly, watching tv at home also help children learn better, watching tv might facilitate children access a massive amount of knowledge and information. For instance, by watching animal programs, they would help children expand their knowledge about the natural habitat of animals as well as the importance of animal conservation. Another example is that when children watch countries programmes, they would help children enrich their knowledge and widen their horizon about cultural diversities all over the world.
In conclusion, it seems to me that children would learn many fascinating things by watching TV. Children should watch tv on a regular basis not only at home but also in school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-29 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-23 | kookiiejeon | 56 | view |
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 81
- Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The Users Of Social Media, Such As Facebook, Twitter, Are Replacing Face-To-Face Contact In This Century. Do You Think The Advantages Of This Way Outweigh The Disadvantages? 61
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching TV. Therefore, children should watch TV regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree?. 56
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person's nature. Discuss and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ing tv at home also help children learn better, watching tv might facilitate children ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31517509728 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85735081206 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568093385214 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6184345199 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400757574857 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159321209747 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138667734356 0.0667982634062 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286679738129 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116438098869 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.