Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages to this.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Critics throughout both the developed and developing countries have debated whether it is good for some companies to make an investment on sports industry for the sake of promoting their own brands. Although there are some advantages for such actions, I would argue that the disadvantages are dominating.
To begin with, the downsides of sponsoring physical activities are outstanding. The most striking problem is on the monetary manipulations on the fans due to the advertisement. Some companies often exploit the positive image of well-received sportsmen to promote professional equipment from their own brands that are usually unnecessary for the amateurs to use in daily life. Such professional equipment is often marked with overly extravagant prices. For example, the sports shoes promoted by the famous football stars are usually a few times more expensive than those meager but comfortable styles. However, due to the effect of celebrity endorsement, many fans might devote enormous money to buy those items, resulting in waste of money.
Despite the arguments above, the upsides of sponsorship, meanwhile, cannot be neglected. Undoubtedly in materialized societies, money is necessary to improve facilities and train athletes. Investment made by companies can definitely foster development of sports, boosting the performance of sportsmen for participating in international competitions such as Olympics Games and can eventually promote national image. Compared to those without sponsorship, sports with financial supports, like swimming, can often witness better achievement in international championships. Therefore, it is generally accepted that investment by private sectors can help promote sports.
To sum up, as far as I am concerned, the drawbacks of sports sponsorship far outweigh benefits, which are viable if the government can allocate enough resources and supports to. Moreover, government should also regulate the advertisement to mitigate the drawbacks occurred due to companies’ investment.
- The bar graph below shows the number of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and report in th main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar graph below shows the number of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 83
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 73
- Violence in the media promote violence in society.To what extent do you agree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85135135135 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26781234413 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641891891892 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6328448866 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.466666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109918590121 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324826587507 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390785101851 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700852565724 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051115428391 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.