Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views

Should teenagers do part-time work? While some nations allow their teens to have a part-time job as their transition from being a youngster to an adult, others have found significant negative consequences in that approach. This essay will take a close look at both views before demonstrating that part-time jobs seem to have more advantages than disadvantages.
Firstly, older teenagers are in a stage where they are reaching the age of responsibility and financial independence, and there are various reasons that teens want to work. Most of their motivation for work stems from desire to have enough money to buy things. Typically, they tend to spend their money on clothing college or helping their families with the living expenses. For this reason, adolescents who get part-time jobs benefit from the valuable work experiences, which are excellent for their resumes, helping them to land a well-paid job. Beside that, by getting a job early on in life, young people can improve their self-confidence, enhance their communication skills, and learn how to handle people. They can, thus, mature into responsible adults and become independent early on in life.
On the other hand, some studies suggest there are also downsides to get a part-time job at an early age. Focusing too much on work may discourage teens from going to school, and that can lead to poor academic performance and low grades. Moreover, balancing work and school could be hard for students, and the pressure and stress that leads them form negative views of work.
In summary, encouraging teenagers to do part-time work has its pros and cons. However, I believe that teenagers should be encouraged to have a part-time job if that does not impact their studies negatively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in summary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11888111888 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7996230788 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611888111888 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1750865828 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234856595732 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933880416773 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821293655928 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179090200503 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994945461333 0.056905535591 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.