Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
The entrance expenses of aesthetic institutions including museums and art galleries have become a matter of controversies since while this admission fees are being applied in some galleries, the others still welcome visitors with free-of-charge exhibitions. From my perspective, the charging fees for visiting museums may have certain drawbacks, but its merits are much more considerable
To initiate, charging admissions fees may result in certain harmful effects on museums and art galleries. The first and foremost hazard is that it may diminish the average quantities of visitors. There seems to be a gloomy truth that museums and art galleries are often be considered as a tedious or monotonous place. Consequently, together with an admission charge, several people, especially the ones with monetary difficulty, will have to think twice before entering museums. An illustration of this is youngsters. With just a humble allowance from their parents, this is foreseeable that going to the internet cafes or the stadiums will be a much more appropriate choice for them when compared to museums and art galleries
Nevertheless, there is a variety of advantageous impacts that admissions fees bring. One fundamental plus point is that selling tickets allowing these art centres to maintain their operation with a sufficient financial condition. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that museums and art galleries need their own fundings to afford their daily necessities as well as serve their day-to-day work. By the way of exemplifying, museums often located within colossal buildings, thereby requiring an enormous amount of money for their facilities in forms of maintenance and renovation. Furthermore, money from admission fees also enable these organisations to purchase new artworks, which is vital for refreshing themself in order to draw more attention from visitors
In conclusion, despite charging admission fees will decrease the number of visitors to museums and art galleries, it is still vital for these places to have entry expense to maintain their operation and to afford new objects of art
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | mary.ssherr | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | damn999 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 73
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 82
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49847094801 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01031466918 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562691131498 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.289086278 49.4020404114 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.454545455 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7272727273 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7272727273 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367059990364 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119966926079 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109788027982 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249902507519 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812845877014 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.