Some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others, agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, the necessity of ascertaining our ancestors or paying more attention to the present and coming generations has called into question. Some people put more emphasis on the former argument that it is more paramount than the latter. From my perspective, I think caring for the current and future generations is much more worthwhile.
To begin with, there are several considerable benefits to discovering one’s family background. First of all, doing some studies about the past can help someone gain a profound insight of their forefathers. They can be proud of the sacrifice of their ancestors and then bridge the generation gap as well as encourage them to keep their family's traditions. Furthermore, many inherited diseases are more likely to exist, and research into family history may help to diagnose, prevent, and treat them. For example, color blindness is typically an inherited genetic disorder,and if they can find the origin of this disease , they will treat it.
By contrast, there are numerous compelling reasons why we should concentrate on the present and future rather than on the past. The first reason is that we are living at the moment and keep going to move forward into the future, and we can not change anything in the past. Therefore, instead of wasting time on finding out family history, we should enhance our knowledge to have a better life. The second one is that doing researches related to history’s origin has seemingly brought no relevant values for the present and future. This information maybe is out of date and can not apply in reality. Last but not least, humans need to spend time and money taking care of themselves and living for the sake of future generations rather than discovering their past. For example, they can focus on making new products or treatments to improve their life.
To sum up, both learning about family origin and concerning about present and future generations play a crucial role for human beings in our daily basics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tieuquynh | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | annenguyen0203 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 82
- The below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 61
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Food products labels should contain detailed information about that food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
... typically an inherited genetic disorder,and if they can find the origin of this dis...
^^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...they can find the origin of this disease , they will treat it. By contrast, the...
^^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ney taking care of themselves and living for the sake of future generations rathe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, as well as, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00895522388 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63743545127 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579104477612 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.630302093 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247249960505 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752028606376 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412634837812 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132048652219 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500735958865 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.