Some people believe that the aging population is good for business the economy and society Other howeve disagree with this view Discuss both views and give your opinion
One of the most controversial today relates to whether the aging population brings benefits to enterprises, the economy, and society. This essay will discuss the question from both points of view and clarity why I agree with the latter group.
On the one side of the argument, there are some economic and societal benefits. Firstly, senior workers are able to contribute to some sectors such as teaching, doctors, and scientific research thanks to their extensive experience. One good illustration of this is the vast knowledge and hands-on experience of professional doctors helping patients overcome serious surgeries. It is also possible to say that the aging population brings perks to society by grandparents can do babysitting, mentally support, and participate in entertainment activities.
On the other hand, It is often argued that the economy will be affected in the future. The main reason for this issue is the level of births becomes less, which leads to a smaller number of children, and those who labor force make material wealth in society will be shortened. Secondly, more old people would pose a burden to families since parents would have to take care of older family members, and no doubt aged citizens tend to be conservative and stubborn, which causes frequent conflicts.
In conclusion, both arguments have their benefits. It has an advantage for some certain fields because of the level of seniority of people. However, I believe that all aspects of society will be negatively affected in the future, especially the national economy.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-05-07 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
2022-11-07 | jadenguyen | 61 | view |
2021-08-23 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
2021-08-23 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
2020-07-07 | longpm2k | 89 | view |
- The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2011 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparation where relevant 73
- M t s ng i ngh r ng s c kh e t t l r t quan tr ng i v i m i ng i v v y d ch v y t kh ng n n c i u h nh b i c c c ng ty v l i nhu n u i m c a d ch v y t t nh n c v t tr i h n nh c i m kh ng 11
- explain some of the ways in which human activities are damaging the environment what can the government do to address these problem 56
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be taken to address those problems 61
- The graph below shows the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24302788845 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82661952516 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657370517928 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5402607154 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229192414769 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675967493179 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405107204214 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122228029073 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037973363887 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.