Some people believe that the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
In recent years, there have been two opposing views on how to cope with the problem of traffic jam. Some masses ponder that authority should allocate more funds for the construction of railways and metro systems. However, others consider road-widening policies a feasible solution to improve traffic flow. In this essay, I shall discuss both the aspects before commenting my opinion.
on the one hand, there are some clear reasons why the extension and construction of roads can alleviate the volume of traffic. The most obvious reason is, the existing roads are inadequate to provide the space for the increasing of cars. In big cities, people, who live in the outskirts, usually commute to work by their own car. This may leads to a rise in traffic congestion in both inside as well as outside of the city.
On the other hand, people believe that government should spending money on building trains and subway lines is better decision to tackle traffic jam. Firstly, since such public transport usually runs quickly than cars, people tend to give priorities these forms of transport to travel. This may relieve the pressure on the current roads. For example, in metropolitan cities have facility of metro train, which is very helpful to control traffic no the road.
In my opinion, although more network on the roads is built, people are able to drive on an alternative way to reduce crowd when traffic is occur, but it is a short term solution because day-by-day the numbers of vehicles increasing on the roads and sometimes, there is rarely available land to extend roads, especially in large cities. The metro network, built underground, would therefore be a more practical option, and it has proved in many cities across the world.
In conclusion, although the size of roads cut traffic jams, it seems to me that installing train and subway is an effective solution to overcome the number of vehicles on the roads.
- Most countries spend much money on education as they start to realise the importance of education in your opinion which two subjects are the most important for you and people and which one is the least important 86
- The graphs below show the seasonal data of two Brazilian cities over the year. 67
- Some people believe that the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both the views and give your 50
- Research suggest that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crime when set free Why do you think is the case What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Individuals and countries cannot help everyone who needs help in the world so they should only be concerned about their own countries and communities Do you agree or disagree 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...spects before commenting my opinion. on the one hand, there are some clear reas...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...se in traffic congestion in both inside as well as outside of the city. On the other ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...hich is very helpful to control traffic no the road. In my opinion, although...
^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...helpful to control traffic no the road. In my opinion, although more network on ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96604938272 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54390460066 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608024691358 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2815929003 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32510691338 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897527377584 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100752640884 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153123766175 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674276723168 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.