Some people believe that robots are important for humans to develop their future, while
others think that it is a dangerous invention that will impact society negatively. Discuss both
sides and give your opinion.
In contemporary era, technology makes easy human life; especially, invention of robot has brought a lot of improvement of human race. People are of different opinion about robot; certain argue that robot can be efficient in evolution of human in their forthcoming time, while other opine that it can endangered mankind and it will put bad influence on community. As per my perspective, to certain extent it appears to be reasonable and it will be discussed in ensuing paragraphs.
To begin, certain favourable argument of robot could be put forth. The first and foremost one is , it can be used in research activities. To explain, human can be replaced with robot in research programs , which is danger for human life or sometimes, it may take one's life; therefore, if that type of study can be handled by robot, human life may be saved by them. For instance, humanoid can be used in exploration about radioactive elements which is jeopardizing human. Not only that but also, in space experimentation, robot can be played an important role. Thus, robot can save scientists' life that is significant for one nation.
on the contrary, robotic invention can have detrimental influence in public. Robot are blamed for rising technological unemployment. That is to say, robot is swallowed a lot of job because of its accuracy; as a result, many employees lose their livelihood or many people are wandering due to unemployment. Therefore, recession can be invited as well as dearness can take place in this scenario. What is more, robot is hackneyed. Put more simply, robot does not use in certain places such as bank which has confidential data of society, so that site , robot may be considered as thief of data. Hence, robot imposes harmful effects on human race.
To recapitulate, robot is able to safe one's life but it is used carefully otherwise it spreads negative impact on people which cannot be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-30 | satyam mangroliya | 87 | view |
- Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels 92
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public To what extent do you agree 92
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned while others think people should be free to choose Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that robots are important for humans to develop their future while others think that it is a dangerous invention that will impact society negatively Discuss both sides and give your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'endanger'
Suggestion: endanger
...ing time, while other opine that it can endangered mankind and it will put bad influence o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...put forth. The first and foremost one is , it can be used in research activities. ...
^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...replaced with robot in research programs , which is danger for human life or somet...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...or human life or sometimes, it may take ones life; therefore, if that type of study ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le. Thus, robot can save scientists life that is significant for one nation. ...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of jobs'.
Suggestion: a lot of jobs
...ent. That is to say, robot is swallowed a lot of job because of its accuracy; as a result, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nfidential data of society, so that site , robot may be considered as thief of dat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.996875 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92505603419 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0356532701 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0588235294 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197428449576 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722619246723 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444449714879 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137287355961 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428758576042 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.